Sunday, April 23, 2017

Into Thin Air: Feminist Literary Theory

“Tears streaking my cheeks, weeping like I hadn’t wept since I was a small boy. Safe now, the crushing strain of the preceding days lifted from my shoulders, I cried for my lost companions, I cried because I was grateful to be alive, I cried because I felt terrible for having survived while others had died.”
Jon Krakauer, Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mount Everest Disaster

The final chapters of Into Thin Air is where many characters’ social standing are revealed by remorse and with their interactions with the team. While viewing this novel in a feminist perspective, I quickly realized that it was written in a Phallocentric Narrative perspective. I noticed that there were many different types of character, but very few of them were female. The women that the author explains either are doctors at base camp or loved ones back at home or the one climber slowing down the rest of the team. The impression it gave to me was that women are not fit enough for the trek up Mt. Everest. The tone and the lacking presence of women almost makes it feel like women do not or have very little place on the mountain. I do not believe that the author intended for the female characters to be presented in such a negative way, instead it was just how the many events played out.
When looking closer at Krakauer’s relationships throughout the novel, it is apparent that he bonds more with his fellow male climbers. Krakauer considers Rob Hall, Scott Fischer, Doug Hansen and Andy Harris as role models. The author explains the masculinity and heroism of many of the male characters. For example, “Fischer saw no reason to waste cash on medical treatment for such a minor injury, so he climbed for the next six months with an open, suppurating wound” (Krakauer 87). Krakauer seems to be profoundly drawn towards Fischer’s “raw and emotional, disinclined toward introspection, he had the kind of gregarious, magnetic personality that instantly won him friends for life; hundreds of individuals – including some he’d met just once or twiceconsidered him a bosom buddy” (Krakauer 88). During the weeks leading up to reaching the summit he becomes very close with Andy. Krakauer states “Andy, who revealed himself to be a gifted, extremely patient teacher- and who, as the junior guide, had been assigned to climb with the slowest clients, at the rear” (Krakauer 104). Krakauer only talked positively about his fellow male climbers, so when many of them died he felt guilty and the burden of carrying the rest of the team down to safety. I noticed that Krakauer has opposite views, considering that there are very few sections that are dedicated to positively representing Sandy and Yasuko.


Highlighted individuals lost in 1996 disaster: Doug Hansen, Andy Harris, Rob Hall, and Yasuko Namba

The two women that Krakauer continuously mentions are Yasuko Namba and Sandy Hill Pittman. These women are very opposite from each other. Sandy comes from power and money back in the US, she uses this power to try and control what happens on the mountain. “Her name was Sandy Hill Pittman, and nobody on the mountain cut a higher profile or generated as much gossip” (Krakauer 164). Beck boldly remembers how needy Sandy was on their ascent of Vinson Massif in Antarctica. He states “She brought this humongous duffel bag full of gourmet food that took about four people to even lift. She also brought a portable television and video player so she could watch movies in her tent” (Krakauer 168). Krakauer and the other climbers are aware that Sandy lacks the skill and strength to reach the peak. That is why she orders Lopsang, a Sherpa, to carry her eighty pounds of satellite equipment, so she can broadcast from the peak. This selfishness reminds me of the movie, Dr. Seuss ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’. When the Grinch steals the presents from the people of Whoville, he makes his dog Max drag the shield full of presents and countless times it nearly runs him over. Lopsang was already exhausted from hauling up the heavy equipment, so when he “towed Pittman on a short-rope for five or six hours” he nearly collapsed (Krakauer 201). Not only is she unqualified, she also has been putting a burden on her team’s progress up Everest. Later on in the novel Krakauer expresses how timing is everything. When an individual like Sandy slows down the team the consequences can be deadly. In this case, it was running into the deadly storm. Krakauer strongly stated that if the snowstorm came “two hours later, it is likely nobody would have died”. On the other hand, if the storm came earlier there was a chance that more people would have died. The role of Sandy is still unclear, but her oppression makes the team suffer in the end.

Sandy Pittman on Everest

            Yasuko Namba was another female present during the expedition. She had more skill and strength than Sandy Pittman. She did not play the typical female role at home, “An accomplished business women employed by Federal Express in Tokyo, Yasuko didn’t fit the meek, deferential stereotype of a middle-aged Japanese woman. At home, she’d told me with a laugh, her husband did all the cooking and cleaning” (Krakauer 199). Yasuko was the second Japanese woman to arrive at top of all seven summits. Her endurance made her well respected in the climbing field. She was able to carry her own weight, only relying on the guides for direction. As the team neared the summit Yasuko grew as more of a liability to the team rather than an asset. Her mask ran out of oxygen and she started hallucinating. Krakauer expresses how obvious it was that she was struggling, “Namba’s oxygen ran out, and the diminutive Japanese woman sat down, refusing to move. When I tried to take her oxygen mask off so she could breathe more easily [...] that mask was actually suffocating her” (Krakauer 226). These events accounted for the delay in time, making the team get caught in the eye of the storm. It was shocking how the novel ended with the deaths of many, including Namba.
The fact that the less skilled Sandy Pittman survived and Namba died. Krakauer is not trying to negatively depict women, he is indicating how no one is free from danger on Everest. “In fact, over the past 30 years there have been 418 women who have successfully reached the summit, according to the Himalayan Database. They have been from a wide variety of backgrounds, with different ages, nationalities, socioeconomic status, and reasons for attempting this incredibly dangerous feat” (Funk). Fifty women have finished all the Seven Summits which is an incredible accomplishment of women.

Monday, April 17, 2017

Stairway to a Knock Off?



When looking at Led Zeppelin's famous song Stairway to Heaven and comparing it to the less popular song Taurus written by Spirit, it is apparent that there are many similarities between the two pieces. In the early days both bands toured together around the same time that Spirit had written Taurus. The band Spirit, claims that their song influenced Jimmy Page’s Stairway to Heaven. Stairway to Heaven is believed to be the most popular and valuable rock song of all time. This iconic song has touched everyone in some kind of way, from learning how to play it on a guitar or the final song at the high school dance. Zeppelin is still making millions off Stairway to Heaven, 334 million dollars as of 2008. While at the end of Randy California’s life, the guitarist and songwriter for Spirit, he was only surviving by “playing sitar at an Indian restaurant in exchange for food” (Bassett). While Led Zeppelin was enjoying sold out concerts and making millions, the defeated Spirit was struggling and could not afford to sue Zeppelin at the time. Before Randy California’s death, he stated that Zeppelin ripped off his song and requested some credit or money be put in place for the wrong doing. It makes me question Zeppelin’s integrity, considering that this is not the first rip off accusation against the band. Stairway to Heaven has a guitar solo that has also been linked to many other well-known songs, like All Along the Watchtower by Jimi Hendrix. Is it right for a band to gain fame by ripping off another song written by a long forgotten and disregarded band?

I believe that the evidence is not strong enough to conclude that one of the bands ripped off the other. At about a minute into the song, Taurus, the guitar solo is presented and is almost identical to Stairway to Heaven’s notorious opening guitar verse. Taurus is only two and a half minutes long, while Stairway to Heaven is much lengthier being that it is 10 minutes long. It also apparent that both songs use the same chord progression, descending and in a minor. This chord progression is seen in many other songs and has no copyright law. It is apparent that Led Zeppelin used the copying, transforming, and recombining method. By “copying” this chord progression and “transforming” it into their own. According to Gillian Hedden, Taurus and Stairway to Heaven use different melodies, making it difficult to link these songs together. Great works originate from the past, both Taurus and Stairway to Heaven follow the same chord progression as Sonata di Chittarra, e Violino, con il suo Basso Continuo. As stated by Guitar World, “the work was composed in 1659 […] and nearly the same melody” as the two rock songs. “Copying is how we learn, we can’t introduce anything now until we are fluent in the language of our domain, we do that through emulation” (Ferguson). Artists tend to use material from the past and draws on this to create their own works.

Determining whether a song is a knock-off or an original is very difficult. In regards to the certain guidelines of copyrighting in the music industry, legal trials are rare because there is dilemma between what is acceptable and what is not. As seen in the Zeppelin and Spirit trial, usually it is a battle over compensation from the original artist. At the end of these trials only one side wins, but both are affected by legal expenses and years of public scrutiny. Inspiration is what drives music artists to recreate ideas from the past. “Remixing” is what most of the media acquires in today’s era. I agree with the concept only if the artist gives credit to who deserves it.